May 22, 2013 21:11 UTC

Audio / Economics Report

Burma Places Hopes for Development in Foreign Investment

Read, listen and learn English with this story. Double-click on any word to find the definition in the Merriam-Webster Learner's Dictionary.

Burmese worshipers gather at a Buddhist religious center in Yangon.
Burmese worshipers gather at a Buddhist religious center in Yangon.

Multimedia

Play or download an MP3 of this story
  • Burma Places Hopes for Development in Foreign Investment

TEXT SIZE - +
This is the VOA Special English Economics Report.
 
Burma is in a good position to make big gains in Asia’s fast-growing markets. But development must include all of society and be sustainable for Burma to reach its goals.
 
That is what the Asian Development Bank said in a recent report.
 
Cyn-Young Park is an economist with the bank. She says Burma’s economic position is strengthened by its natural resources, such as oil, gas and minerals. It also has two large, growing neighbors: India and China. And the nation is young: one in four of its citizens are under the age of thirty.
 
But Burma has a long way to go. After fifty years of military rule, it is one of Asia’s poorest countries. Basic infrastructure, like roads, bridges and railways, are not developed. And only thirty percent of rural people have electricity.
 
Burma is trying to increase foreign investment. Its civilian government is struggling to agree on a new foreign investment law. Recent versions of the law restrict foreign ownership in some industries and ban it completely in others.
 
Sean Turnell is an economist with Australia’s Macquarie University. He said the foreign investment law is now facing local disapproval, or push back.
 
SEAN TURNELL: “There’s been a bit of a push back against some of the concessions granted to foreign investors. In particular, there seems to be a walling off of some of the sectors from foreign investors.”
 
For years, Burma’s military closely controlled the economy. Relatives and friends of military members received rich contracts.
 
Now, the civilian government wants to expand services and manufacturing. It is considering giving foreign companies low tax rates so they will invest.
 
But experts say this could be a mistake. Sean Turnell says investors are concerned about infrastructure problems, not taxes. Economists also say tax breaks for local businesses may not be the answer either. They say the lack of access to credit for farmers and businesses in Burma is a bigger problem.
 
Reform in Burma is still in the early stages. The country recently announced new rules ending direct government censorship of news media. Reporters now must send censors their work after it is published, instead of before. Some reporters say they will wait to see if this means more freedom.
 
Cyn-Young Park says investors too are waiting to see if reform will succeed.  
 
CYN-YOUNG PARK: “It is really going to take a while before the investors do believe that this reform is sincere and the government is not going to retrench.”
 
The foreign investment legislation could be signed into law as early as this month.
 
And that’s the VOA Special English Economics Report. I’m Mario Ritter.

You May Like

No records found for this widget:558


This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Soo from: USA
08/28/2012 3:44 PM
Japan colonized ~~????
Wow, Japanese people who can not understand.


by: TKY from: Chiba
08/27/2012 4:45 PM
If I have a rich condition as my family is a member of military, I might not wanna change these situations.Human's ego is a complicated ploblem. So, burma needs financial helps from developed countries.


by: wending from: china
08/25/2012 10:46 PM
the PDF is not about Burma, is the education report.


by: Yoshi from: Sapporo
08/24/2012 4:58 AM
It is a luck for Burman people that millitary government looks like changing democratic even little by little without civilian riot. Ithink Great Briten should invest first to Berma because it had governed Burma before its independence for a long time.

In Response

by: kaz from: osaka japan
08/26/2012 3:06 PM
I am suprized to see your comment.I agree the UK have to invest certain money in Burma.but I dought the UK hasnot enough money.Japan offer her no need retarn the old debt 300billion Jyen from Japan,and to settle another loan for invest the money for establish fundamentals. we need to suport her.

In Response

by: Yoshi from: Sapporo
08/28/2012 8:57 AM
Hi Kaz, thanks for your nice reply. I completely agree with you that we Japanese also should aid Burma financially because Japanese military set up Burman government temporary during WWII beside we are industrialized earlier than Burma. What I want to point out is that the governing way of suzerian countries to colonies may be different between eastern countires and Japan. We Japan colonized Mansyu of China, Taiwan, Korea, and some southeastern Asian countires. Please remember Thai-Burman railway. Please remember hospitals built in Mansyu under Japan's sovereignty during WWII. They are still now avairable as one of infrastructures.
Suzerian countries probably should have responsibility to construct infrastructures of conlonized countries adding to take up and bring resoureces to their home countries. I would like to know what UK's capital left as infrastructures in Burma during its sovereignty? If it did not left sufficient infrastructures in Burma, I think UK should invest Burma first.