May 18, 2013 23:14 UTC

Science & Technology

Can Social Media Improve Voter Turnout?

Read, listen and learn English with this story. Double-click on any word to find the definition in the Merriam-Webster Learner's Dictionary.

Barack Obama is sworn in by Chief Justice John Roberts as the 44th president of the United StatesBarack Obama is sworn in by Chief Justice John Roberts as the 44th president of the United States
x
Barack Obama is sworn in by Chief Justice John Roberts as the 44th president of the United States
Barack Obama is sworn in by Chief Justice John Roberts as the 44th president of the United States

Multimedia

Play or download an MP3 of this story
TEXT SIZE - +
This is the VOA Special English Technology Report.
 
We have all witnessed the power of social media. It helped elect Barack Obama president in two thousand eight. It also helped to support popular revolutions in two thousand ten and eleven that forced several long-time rulers from office.
 
Now, research suggests that social networks could have an even greater effect on elections, helping to increase the number of people who vote.
 
The new report appeared in the journal Nature. It estimates that about one third of a million more people voted in America’s two thousand ten congressional elections all because of a single message on Facebook.
 
James Fowler is a political science professor at the University of California, San Diego. He led the research in partnership with Facebook’s Data Science team. They studied the effect of a “get out the vote” message on more than sixty million Facebook users. The social network placed the message at the top of their Facebook news feeds on Election Day two thousand ten.
 
JAMES FOWLER: “And in the message, there was button that says ‘I Voted’.” There was also a link that you could click on that allowed you to look up your polling place. And in some of the messages we also showed people the pictures of their friends who had clicked on the ‘I Voted’ button earlier in the day.”
 
We spoke to Professor Fowler on Skype. He says the team later compared this information to publicly available voting records.
 
JAMES FOWLER: “And one of the remarkable things that we found was that when we were comparing the people who received these messages to the people who received no messages, the people who saw the message without the faces of their friends actually voted at exactly the same rate as the people who saw no message at all. But the people who saw faces of their friends they actually voted more.”  
 
The researchers say the results of the study show that the message directly influenced about sixty thousand extra people to go and vote. Even more importantly, says Professor Fowler, the friends of the people who saw the message also were influenced to vote. He says this led an additional two hundred eighty thousand people to take part in the elections. As a result, the message influenced a total of three hundred forty thousand people.
 
And, Professor Fowler says the experiment led to an even more interesting finding. It is that in the world of social networking, like in the real world, not all friends are equal.
 
JAMES FOWLER: “It wasn’t all of these online connections that matter. The average person on Facebook today has about one hundred fifty friends. And when we just looked at the close friends, those closest ten people on Facebook, we found that they were driving the whole effect. That all of the extra two hundred eighty thousand voters were coming from just ten out of your one hundred fifty friends.”
 
The researchers say the study suggests that voting is a social behavior. They say social networking may be the best way to get more people involved in the democratic process. And they think this in not only true in politics, but in other areas as well, including public health.
 
And that's the VOA Special English Technology Report, written by June Simms. I'm Steve Ember.
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: chinesesky from: Hong Kong
10/11/2012 9:56 AM
I saw there were freelance job advertising about selling 'friends' in facebook account, it proved that there were some 'people' who is businessman or political gonna to make influence in the social media to get what they exactly want and it is dangerous if people are easy affect by others.


by: schiju from: Bamgladesh
09/29/2012 4:35 PM
media plays an important role today as the three witches' influence on Mackbeth. media can move our mind to one side breaking our logic and judgement power.


by: Vladimir from: ex-USSR
09/26/2012 7:47 AM
I think the social networks is very fascinating to the psychologists. They give great opportunity to study people behavior. Those who invented social network are rare clever men.


by: Publician from: Taiwan
09/26/2012 12:36 AM
People should vote candidates by themselves. We should think whether the politic opinion mentioned by candidate or not. We shouldn't follow someone's or group's selection without thinking. If we do, we will be blind and lose our authorities in the public thing.


by: BIJU.P.Y. from: SOUTH INDIA
09/25/2012 4:29 PM
In reality social medias are the watch dogs of democracy. Internet and other social sites can bring different people's opinion together and it can make revolutionary changes in society.In fact they are the world trade centre of different ideas and thoughts. Such opinions together can suppot a government or throw it off from power. Thank you.


by: TKY from: Chiba, Japan
09/24/2012 3:54 PM
If the social network have ever greater effect for election than ever, I have a practicable suggestion!! How do candidates make their own account so that they can confess their pledes and get the backing of voters? Is it Ridiculous?


by: Yoshi from: Japan
09/24/2012 10:45 AM
Does this story mean only one massage sent to only one person on Facebook pruduced directly tens of thousands of new voters and indirectly about three hundreds thousand in former election? Did all of these voters won't go to polls unless they got Facebook mails? I understand the number of those who both received mails to notice that his Facebook friend had already voted and went to polls was larger than the number of those who didn't notice but voted. I would love to know how mch they were different.

I agree a few of key persons would play an important role in making effect on others behaviors. Major part of citizens are silent thinkers. I have read a book that tells once declined an American bland shoes maker Hushpuppy revived with mouth-to-mouth advertising beginning from several key persons. Facebook must have much more influence on consumers than word-to-mouth communication for better or for worse.

In Response

by: Yoshi from: Sapporo
09/24/2012 9:18 PM
Would all of these voters go to.....

In Response

by: mark from: ha noi viet nam
10/14/2012 2:05 AM
If people in vietnamese use this way to vote,i think it can improve voter,too.

In Response

by: leine mantovani from: Brazil
09/27/2012 3:38 AM
There's one thing I don't understand: can a person vote more than once in the same election? It seems to me that's why this sentence implies - ''But the people who saw faces of their friends they actually voted more.”
Maybe I have just misunderestood the text. Can anyone clarify this please? Thanks.
Anyway I believe everyone should go out and vote no matter if social media tell you to go or not, don't you think?


by: td from: hcmc
09/24/2012 1:43 AM
It's no doubt.It's the century of social network.