May 18, 2013 09:00 UTC

Audio / In the News

Russia, Iran and the Missile Defense Issue

Read, listen and learn English with this story. Double-click on any word to find the definition in the Merriam-Webster Learner's Dictionary.

This April 9, 2012 photo provided by the Institute for Science and International Security, ISIS shows suspected cleanup activities at a building alleged to be used for nuclear weapon related tests in the Parchin military center.This April 9, 2012 photo provided by the Institute for Science and International Security, ISIS shows suspected cleanup activities at a building alleged to be used for nuclear weapon related tests in the Parchin military center.
x
This April 9, 2012 photo provided by the Institute for Science and International Security, ISIS shows suspected cleanup activities at a building alleged to be used for nuclear weapon related tests in the Parchin military center.
This April 9, 2012 photo provided by the Institute for Science and International Security, ISIS shows suspected cleanup activities at a building alleged to be used for nuclear weapon related tests in the Parchin military center.

Multimedia

Play or download an MP3 of this story
TEXT SIZE - +
This is IN THE NEWS in VOA Special English.
 
The next international talks on Iran’s nuclear program take place this month in Moscow. The talks come as Russia continues to oppose missile-defense plans designed to answer a possible nuclear threat from Iran. 
 
The United States and the European Union believe that a goal of Iran’s uranium enrichment program is to possess nuclear weapons. The Iranian government says it only wants to use its enriched uranium for peaceful purposes, such as producing electricity.
 
Talks between Iran and six world powers have gone on for years. The six countries are the United States, Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia.
 
The latest two-day meeting took place in Baghdad last month. There was very little progress. Negotiators agreed to meet in Moscow in the middle of June.
 
The common thinking is that Russian economic interests in Iran have led Russia to be a strong supporter of Iran. But many experts say Russia has taken a stronger position on Iran during the past few years.
 
Robert Legvold of Columbia University says one reason was what American officials have called the reset in relations with Russia. Mr. Legvold says that does not mean there are no disagreements between the United States and Russia over Iran. He says the possibility of some kind of military attack on Iran makes the Russians nervous.
 
ROBERT LEGVOLD: "And the Russians are very antsy about the idea of a military option, whether it’s Israel that executes it or whether it is some kind of a U.S. option, or the U.S. with Israel together. They also continue to push much harder on the diplomatic option rather than further tightening of sanctions.”
 
But Russia has voted in the past for economic sanctions against Iran in the United Nations. And Stephen Cohen, professor emeritus at Princeton University and New York University, says that is not all Russia has done.
 
STEPHEN COHEN: "Russia cancelled a deal it had with the Iranian government to supply it with anti-aircraft missiles, the kind of anti-aircraft missiles that Iran would need to defend itself if it was attacked by Israel or the United States, which remains, by the way, on at least the theoretical agenda. These were enormous concessions by Moscow.”
 
Experts say one area where Russia will not compromise is missile defense. This American-led idea is tied to the possible nuclear threat from Iran. The Obama administration has proposed deployment of anti-missile interceptors on navy ships at sea. There also would be land-based versions of these anti-missile missiles. Some would be sent to former Warsaw Pact countries in Eastern Europe.
 
Russia has always opposed American plans for a missile defense system in Europe. Russian officials see it as aimed against Russia. Robert Legvold at Columbia University says Russia’s main objection is tied to the last part of the missile defense plan. That part, known as Phase Four, is set for deployment in twenty-twenty.
 
ROBERT LEGVOLD: “The problem with Phase Four -- and we begin moving that way with Phase Three -- is that that is an intercontinental ballistic missile system designed to defend the entire continent, not merely what’s called theater systems, which is what the shorter-range systems are. And those, theoretically, depending on where they are deployed, could be something of a threat to the Russian nuclear deterrent.”
 
NATO leaders restated their support for the missile defense plan when they met last month in Chicago. And that's IN THE NEWS in VOA Special English. I'm Steve Ember.
 
___
 
Contributing: Andre de Nesnera
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Mike from: USA
06/08/2012 10:51 PM
I find it a positive note that Russia is taking a stance against the possible enrichement for missle grade uranium. I think there are ways that Iran can build its trust with the nations. Inspections, things of that nature. I as well think the United States should work with Russia on its issue with the missle defense phase 4. I can understand the USA and it allies paranoia about a nucluer capable Iran and its hell bent agenda to destroy whatever it can. I think Russia should as well work with the USA as it seems to have done by declining missles to the country. Sanctions are nessecary I believe on the Iranian government, not its people. I think much needed supplies should be somehow provided and distributed to thier people. The Iranian people are under the rule of its government, and shouldn't pay their penalty if they refuse to provide evidence of nucleur enrichment for peaceful purposes.


by: Chizimi from: Japan
06/08/2012 5:36 AM
I could understand about Missile Defense Issue when I read this article. I didn't know about issue of missile. But, I found that Russia has taken a stronger position on Iran during the past few years. I hope that the missile decrese in the world.


by: Yoshi from: Sapporo
06/04/2012 2:20 AM
I think disarmaments should progress especially in member countries of NPT.


by: Antonio Paulo from: brazil
06/03/2012 9:12 AM
Frequently I open pages like this using Google Chrome to translate to Portuguese, period by period, but the images on the right side becames in the first plan and the translatoreds subtitles in the second one, so I can't see them. Could someone, please, fix this ? Sorry for may bad english.


by: Alex from: Russia
06/03/2012 8:32 AM
I think that any millitary activity near the border would become dangerous at any time and if Russia will start to deploy missiles in Cuba now it will create resonable antsy from US.

In Response

by: BIJU.P.Y. from: SOUTH INDIA
06/04/2012 4:32 PM
I think it is high time that Iran is held back from its efforts to develop nuclear arms. In my opinion, Iran will definitely take great advantage of the long silence shown by the rest of the world. Iran must be brought to the international mainstream to re-think. I'm sure that if Iran developed it, they cannot help using it at the earliest oppertunity. So be cautious. Thank you.


by: Laurent from: France
06/02/2012 3:12 PM
What is considered by Russia like a threat ?The shorter-range systems can be too a threat... Isn't ?

In Response

by: Javier from: San Diego
06/06/2012 9:17 PM
Russia does not have any similiar competitive system!