May 25, 2013 22:00 UTC

Audio / Economics Report

US Postal Service Wants Congress to Make Changes to Its Business Model

Read, listen and learn English with this story. Double-click on any word to find the definition in the Merriam-Webster Learner's Dictionary.

Ohio representative Dennis Kucinich and activists from the Postal Workers Union demonstrate to urge Congress to take action to help the United States Postal Service in June. Ohio representative Dennis Kucinich and activists from the Postal Workers Union demonstrate to urge Congress to take action to help the United States Postal Service in June.
x
Ohio representative Dennis Kucinich and activists from the Postal Workers Union demonstrate to urge Congress to take action to help the United States Postal Service in June.
Ohio representative Dennis Kucinich and activists from the Postal Workers Union demonstrate to urge Congress to take action to help the United States Postal Service in June.

Multimedia

Play or download an MP3 of this story
  • US Postal Service Wants Congress to Make Changes to Its Business Model

TEXT SIZE - +
This is the VOA Special English Economics Report.
 
This month, the United States Postal Service reported a loss of over five billion dollars from April to June. The Postal Service says it expects to report a loss of fifteen billion dollars for the twelve-month period ending in September. And the government agency has warned of even bigger losses if Congress does not let it change the way it does business.
 
The United States Postal Service, or USPS, has a long history in America. Benjamin Franklin was appointed the first Postmaster General, or head of the postal service, in seventeen seventy-five.
 
But the Postal Service says its income has not kept up with growing costs. Profitable first class mail is decreasing.
 
The service says most of its recent losses resulted from making payments to its health care program for retirees. About a billion dollars of the loss was for payments to injured workers.
 
The news from April to June was not all bad. Improvements in the economy fueled a nine percent increase in income from shipping and delivery. The Postal Service says it is less costly to send letters and packages in the mail than to use private companies.

The Postal Service says it has cut operating costs by a total of fourteen billion dollars in the past five years. To improve its financial health, the agency has proposed cutting service on Saturdays. It also wants Congress to cancel a requirement that the postal service make advance payments to the health care program for retired workers. USPS also wants the Treasury Department to return eleven billion dollars in overpayments made to its pension plan for retirees.
 
On August first, USPS failed to make a required payment of five point five billion dollars for health care benefits for future retirees. It was the first time the postal service has ever failed to make such a payment. And, the service is warning that it may have to delay making payments to companies to which it owes money.
 
The Postal Service says that without major changes, it will continue to lose billions of dollars a year. The Washington Post newspaper reported that Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe told reporters “Congress needs to act responsibly.” In his words, “this is no way to run any kind of business.”
 
The Postal Service receives money to pay for operations from the sale of stamps, products and shipping services. It does not receive direct government assistance, but is controlled by the federal government.
 
And that’s the VOA Special English Economics Report. I’m Christopher Cruise.

You May Like

No records found for this widget:558


This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Cindy from: qRrIkLfiFqOSBiXsgcJ
09/12/2012 11:55 AM
Clear, informtaive, simple. Could I send you some e-hugs?


by: rich from: tx
08/31/2012 9:34 PM
Since 1971, the postal service has not taken a dime from taxpayers. All of its operations--including the remarkable convenience of 32,000 local post offices (more service outlets than Walmart, Starbucks, and McDonald's combined)--are paid for by peddling stamps and other products.

In 2006, the Bush White House and Congress whacked the post office with the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act--an incredible piece of ugliness requiring the agency to PRE-PAY the health care benefits not only of current employees, but also of all employees who'll retire during the next 75 years. Yes, that includes employees who're not yet born! No other agency and no corporation has to do this. Worse, this ridiculous law demands that USPS fully fund this seven-decade burden by 2016. This politically motivated mandate is costing the Postal Service $5.5 billion a year--money taken right out of postage revenue that could be going to services. That's the real source of the "financial crisis" squeez-ing America's post offices.

Before passage of the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (“PAEA”), here are the financials numbers - 06' net income $969M, 05' net income $1.445B, 04' net income $3.065B, 03' net income $3.868B, 02' net income loss ($676M), 01' net loss ($1.680B), 00' net loss ($199M), 99' net income $363M.

The statutory obligation to pre-fund retiree health obligations — which no other business or government agency bears — added $12.4 billion in costs to the Postal Service’s balance sheet from FY2007 to FY2009. During those same three years, the Postal Service had a cumulative net operating loss of approximately $11.8 billion. Thus, without the unique burden imposed by the PAEA’s pre-funding requirement, everything else equal, the Postal Service would have enjoyed a cumulative profit of $611M during those years.In fact, according to USPS financial statements, pre-funding accounts for 80 percent of the red ink in the first three quarters of fiscal 2012. Overall, since pre-funding went into effect in 2007, it accounts for 83 percent of the Postal Service’s losses. That means that only 17 percent of all the red ink stems from actual mail operations, including the decline in first-class mail.

The irony of Congress continuing to insist on pre-funding is that the Postal Service already has funded nearly 50 percent of the FUTURE retiree health benefits obligation ($44.1 billion of the $90.3 billion future obligation), more than any company in America and enough for decades into the future. That probably is enough to stop all the payments and just let the interest do the work of building up the fund. One last point about the retiree health care fund. Even though there's plenty of money in the fund, the premiums for CURRENT retirees continue to be paid on a "pay as you go" model like the rest of the federal government and that amount is included in the regular operating expenses.


by: Yoshi from: Sapporo
08/31/2012 5:53 AM
I'm not sure if American postal service workers are public servants or not and how the cost for health care survice is shared among workers, employers and tax from government. If total cost for health care and pension are payed by postal service, it would be too heavier burden for it. By the way, a billion of dollars costing for injured workers seems big money.

In Response

by: Mauro Sanchez from: Cuenca, Ecuador.
08/31/2012 8:27 PM
Hi, dear Yoshi. I disagree with you, because spending in health care, pensions and other kinds of social benefits among workers and retirees, never will be big money. Maybe have you ever asked yourself if making war such as: in Korea, Vietnam, two wars in Irak or in Afghanistan is too heavier burden or big money? It`s time to see the other side of the coin.

In Response

by: Yoshi from: Sapporo
09/04/2012 5:12 AM
I agree the cost spent in operating war is apparently far more expensive than that of social welfare, needless to say. What I think quetionable is that why a billion of dollars is need for injured USPS workers. How many workers are there in USPS? I suppose injured workers are all injured during working on postal service. Is injured rate of USPS workers during work high? Or do they include those who injured after work or any other cause like during millitari service?

In Response

by: mike from: usa
09/24/2012 3:09 PM
over 500,000 workers