President Joe Biden’s administration is considering new rules on federal financing of public charter schools.
Charter schools are different from traditional public schools. They operate similarly to private schools, but still receive money from the government.
The National Alliance for Public Charter Schools says that charter schools are a public “school of choice.” They are free to attend like other public schools.
Charters are given more freedom than traditional public schools in operations and development of curriculum. They are not governed by local school boards and are free from many state and local regulations. To get permission to operate, a school must establish a “charter,” promising to meet certain academic standards.
The federal Charter Schools Program gives money for the planning and design of new charter schools, also called startups.
The administration’s proposed new rules would not affect existing charter schools. But new charter schools seeking federal money would have to meet new requirements. For example, the federal government would give priority to charter schools that work with local school districts.
The new rules also would block for-profit charter schools from receiving government financing. For-profit charter schools are controversial because they are operated by for-profit companies. The Biden administration has been very critical of for-profit charter schools, arguing that public money should not go to for-profit companies.
Supporters of charter schools say it is good they have more freedom in what and how to teach. But critics argue that charter schools should be supervised by state and local governments. They also argue that public money for charter schools takes such support away from traditional public schools.
The administration is requiring new charter schools to prove there is demand for their school. They also need to prove they would not worsen school segregation, a major criticism of charter schools. A 2017 study by The Associated Press found that 17 percent of charter schools are made up of at least 99 percent minority students. Just 4 percent of traditional public schools are 99 percent minority students.
Opponents of the new rules for the federal Charter Schools program say they would limit charter school growth. They argue that the new requirements are too difficult to meet.
But Assistant Education Secretary Roberto Rodríguez argued that there should be more supervision of how charter schools are funded. In an interview with Chalkbeat last week, he said that 15 percent of charter schools that received federal start-up money never opened. He said that cost the federal government $174 million.
The Washington Post editorial board published an article in April critical of the administration’s new rules, calling them a “sneak attack.” It argues that the rules are “designed to squelch charter growth.”
Nina Rees is the president of the National Alliance. She said, “Traditional schools may be under-enrolled, but parents are looking for more than just a seat for their child. They want high quality seats.”
Rees’ organization says charters currently enroll more than 3.4 million students. That number represents about seven percent of all public school students.
Charter schools have support across political parties. Research has also shown they have improved over the last several years, and sometimes outperform traditional publics. But many charters also have had mixed success.
An upcoming decision by the Supreme Court could also change how charter schools operate.
Many states, like Maine, offer “voucher” programs. This is a program in which the government provides money, or vouchers, to families for attendance at a private school of their choice. Private schools are not operated by the government and cost money to attend.
A law in Maine challenged in the Supreme Court makes it illegal for families to use the money to attend a private school that is religion-based.
That could lead all states with voucher programs to include religious schools. It is illegal in the United States for the government to directly fund religious schools and other religious institutions because of the separation of church and state in the U.S. constitution.
Legal scholars say that raises the question of if religious schools are included in voucher programs, could religious schools be included in charter programs? Religious schools' enrollment has decreased in recent years. They may see religious charters as a way to increase enrollment again.
Some legal experts say that because charter schools are not officially operated by the government, they should be permitted to be religious.
A paper in the conservative Manhattan Institute for Policy Research argues “religious charter schools are not only constitutionally permissible in most states… but where they are permissible, they may not be prohibited."
But charter schools in most states are still defined as “public,” meaning they cannot be religious. And many supporters of charter schools hope that they remain non-religious.
“The bottom line is: Charter schools, as public schools, can never be religious institutions,” Rees said in Chalkbeat. “And anyone who says differently is flat-out wrong.”
I’m Dan Novak.
And I’m Caty Weaver.
Dan Novak wrote this story for VOA Learning English, with additional reporting from Chalkbeat.
Words in This Story
curriculum— n. the courses that are taught by a school, college, etc.
regulation — n. an official rule or law that says how something should be done
standard — n. a level of quality, achievement, etc., that is considered acceptable or desirable
priority — n. something that is more important than other things and that needs to be done or dealt with first
sneak — adj. done while others are not paying attention
squelch— v. to stop from continuing by doing or saying something
enrollment — n. a policy or process by which parents may send their children to a different public school than the one in their own community
segregation — n. the practice or policy of keeping people of different races, religions, etc., separate from each other
institution — n. an established organization
prohibit — v. to order someone not to use or do something